A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: Are Megasonic cleaners really that much better?
Are Megasonic cleaners really that much better?
2005-11-04
[email protected]
2005-11-04
Jack Mulligan
Are Megasonic cleaners really that much better?
Jack Mulligan
2005-11-04
Vacuum caviational streaming is another and will do the least part damage.
But, to get something very cheap you are probably best off finding a
remarket sonic unit as they are everywhere. Vacuum cavitational streaming is
still a little new for that.

I am amazed at how cheap some of these types of things can be on Dovebid,
ebay, etc.

Good luck

Jack

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 9:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mems-talk] Are Megasonic cleaners really that much better?


Hello all,

I hear Megasonic baths (>400 Hz) are much better than Ultrasonic baths
(25 -100 kHz) for cleaning.
Not only do they remove particulates etc. better they also seem to be more
gentle on structures on samples (e.g. structures in SU-8).
Can anyone comment on this?

Also are there any particularly cost-effective units?
NANO-MASTER Megasonic and  ProSys seem to be two popular manufacturers.
reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
MEMStaff Inc.
MEMS Technology Review
Mentor Graphics Corporation
University Wafer