A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: DRIE STS vs ALCATEL
DRIE STS vs ALCATEL
2001-12-07
Matthieu Guirardel
2001-12-07
Sun Yu
2001-12-07
[email protected]
DRIE STS vs ALCATEL
[email protected]
2001-12-07
I have asked this question of several STS engineers. Here are some answers.

STS does not recommend aluminum or other metals being exposed in their
DRIE tools as the metal will be sputtered by SFx+ ions.
This results in several problems:

1. The sputtered metal can land elsewhere on the wafer, causing micromasking
(grass).

2. The sputtered metal can coat the cylindrical ceramic liner in the top of
the chamber.
Outside of this liner is the single-turn coil that generates the plasma.
When a thin layer of metal coats the liner, electric fields cannot penetrate
it as well,
resulting in less plasma generation and hence lower etch rate.
The liner can be mechanically cleaned by bead blasting or perhaps just
scrubbing.
Buying a new one costs on the order of $10k.

Some STS users have, however, used metal masks without a problem.
STS does not have an explanation for this, and recommends playing it safe.

        --Kirt Williams         Agilent Technologies

> >
> >I know that with Alcatel DRIE engines we can use Al as mask
> can we do it
> >with STS multiplex ICP too ?

reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
MEMS Technology Review
Process Variations in Microsystems Manufacturing
University Wafer
The Branford Group