E-beam and thermal evaporation of 100 nm thick nickel
Ruiz, Marcos Daniel (SENCOE)
2009-09-25
We used Ni E-beam evaporation several years ago. If I remember
correctly, we put the Ni source directly into the Cu hearth (without a
graphite crucible). Also, I believe we used a Cr adhesion layer.
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: mems-talk-bounces@memsnet.org
[mailto:mems-talk-bounces@memsnet.org] On Behalf Of Jungwook Choi
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:32 PM
To: General MEMS discussion
Subject: [mems-talk] E-beam and thermal evaporation of 100 nm thick
nickel
Dear all,
I tried to deposit 100 nm nickel film on silicon wafer by using e-beam or
thermal evaporator. In both cases, the nickel pellets were utilized as a
source.
In the case of e-beam evaporation, the deposition rate was not over
0.1~0.2 A/s. When I increased e-beam power to increase deposition rate,
the graphite crucible was broken with cracks. Is there anyone that has
experience to evaporate nickel using e-beam evaporation? Which type of
nickel sources is adequate for this?
Similarly, in the case of thermal evaporation, the tungsten boat was
suddenly broken before evaporating nickel. The holes were observed in the
broken tungsten boat. How to avoid the failure of tungsten boat? If I
replace a tungsten boat to a tungsten helix coil with nickel wires as a
source, could it be better in thermal evaporation?
Any suggestions and comments would be highly appreciated regarding above
issues.
Additionally, does adhesion layer such as Cr and Ti is needed to deposit
nickel on silicon? What is the optimum thickness of the adhesion layers?
Thanks,
J. Choi